[CF-metadata] Thoughts about CF future

[John Caron]

Jonathan Gregory wrote:

>Dear John
>
>Thank you for your helpful thoughts. I agree that we need to think about all
>the points you listed, and also about governance arrangements. We also have a
>pressing need for staff effort to devote to CF.
>
>  
>
>>CF has a small section about 
>>both Station and Trajectory data, that is good as far as it goes, but 
>>needs more semantics to be complete.
>>    
>>
>
>In its current form it is appropriate for GCM output and hence useful to the
>standard. Could you elaborate the ways in which it is incomplete?
>
>  
>
Sorry i havent responded to this. I will try to summarize ASAP.

In the meanwhile, I have a programmer from ESRI  looking for example CF 
station data. Please send me samples if you can, which may help me 
clarify my thoughts on what else might be done, if anything.

Thanks!