[CF-metadata] CF convention for vector quantities

[John Caron]

Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear Bert et al.
> 
> I read Bert's original proposal carelessly - sorry. It was to introduce extra
> dummy variables to point to components, rather than to take the component info
> out of the standard names of the components.
> 
> I remain unconvinced about introducing this kind of information into the file,
> as it cannot be depended upon if it is optional, so it doesn't help simplify
> programs, and it is redundant because it can be deduced on the fly (I think).
> However I know I have a general preference for clever programs and stupid
> (though complete, correct and clear) files.

Hi Jonathan:

I appreciate your advocacy of that POV throughout the years, its very important that we maintain CF files to be as simple amd clear as possible. I also observe the tension between data providers and consumers, and it seems likely we will always be looking for the right balance between program writers and file writers.

Regards,
John