[CF-metadata] standard name proposal for CCMVal

[Martin Juckes]

It doesn't diagnose ozone loss, it is used to diagnose ozone loss. It is also 
used for other purposes.

What is wrong with using passive to mean not active?

Martin

On Friday 07 March 2008 09:30, you wrote:
> Dear Martin (not via list)
> 
> > it ozone in the sense that it is initialised from the model ozone fields.
> I see.
> How does it diagnose chemical loss? Is it destroyed like real ozone? If it
> is just advected and diffused and there are no sources following 
initialisation
> it must end up spread out uniformly, I suppose.
> 
> I'm sure we can devise a name which isn't too long but which say what this
> quantity is.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Jonathan
> 
>