[CF-metadata] CF errata

[Brian Eaton]

Hi Jonathan,

After reading the trac ticket you opened on this issue I realized that the
technical term in question is "auxiliary", not "associated".  It's been a
while since I looked at the convention.  So the current wording is not
incorrect as I initially thought.  But I think the original wording
(without associated) is clearer.

Brian


On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 08:35:13AM +0100, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear John
> 
> I agree too, and I have put it in a "defect" trac ticket. If no-one objects
> within three weeks, Velimir will correct it.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Jonathan