[CF-metadata] Proposal for additional CF biogeochemistry attributes

[Philip Cameronsmith]

Hi All,

To help bring this to a conclusion, let me reiterate and say that 
mole_ratio_of_X_to_Y_in_medium is acceptable to me.

Best wishes,

      Philip

On Thu, 14 May 2009, Bruce Hackett wrote:

> Dear all,
> I don't have vote here, but if you're going for a new prefix, then "mole_ratio_" sounds better
> to me.
> Cheers, Bruce
> 
> Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> 
> Dear Philip
> 
> I would be happy with
> 
>
>     mole_ratio_of_X_to_Y_in_medium
> 
> 
> i.e. the same as what I suggested, without "mixing". I think that mole_ratio
> is better than mole_fraction. I don't think it sounds right to say "fraction
> of X to Y"; don't we normally say "ratio of X to Y"?
> 
> Best wishes
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Bruce Hackett                         Senior Scientist
>    Norwegian Meteorological Institute (met.no), R & D Div.
>    P.O. Box 43 - Blindern                e-mail: Bruce.Hackett at met.no
>    N-0313 Oslo                           Phone:  +47 22 96 33 39
>    NORWAY                                Fax:    +47 22 96 33 80
>                                          Mob:    +47 48 048 958
>    URL:  http:// met.no/english/r_and_d_activities/people/bruceh.html
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Philip Cameron-Smith        Atmospheric, Earth, and Energy Division
pjc at llnl.gov                   Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
+1 925 4236634                 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA94550, USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------