[CF-metadata] CF-1.6 Conformance Requirements/Recommendations

John Graybeal jbgraybeal at mindspring.com
Wed Mar 28 12:09:48 MDT 2012


suggest the more general "but applications using the auxiliary coordinates to work with data may respond unpredictably when the auxiliary coordinates are missing."

john

On Mar 28, 2012, at 10:07, John Caron wrote:

> On 3/28/2012 10:49 AM, John Caron wrote:
>> I think we have a number of valid use cases for missing data in aux coordinates, and i would vote to allow that. 
> 
> sorry i didnt really answer jonathan's concern. I would suggest this wording:
> 
> Auxiliary coordinates do not have to be monotonic or have unique values, and may contain missing values. Data providers may choose to put valid data where the auxiliary coordinates are missing, but applications are free to assume that data is missing where the auxiliary coordinates are missing.
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata



John Graybeal   <mailto:jgraybeal at ucsd.edu> 
phone: 858-534-2162
Product Manager
Ocean Observatories Initiative Cyberinfrastructure Project: http://ci.oceanobservatories.org
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org   




More information about the CF-metadata mailing list