[CF-metadata] Is "psu" a valid cf unit?
sarms at ucar.edu
Tue Jul 18 07:34:17 MDT 2017
There was a github issue opened on UDUNITS2 a few years back (still
open, btw) regarding the support for PSU in the package:
An interesting point is made regarding units and physical quantities.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:12 AM, V. Balaji - NOAA Affiliate
<v.balaji at noaa.gov> wrote:
> The ocean modeling community is adamant that they will continue to use PSUs
> for salinity: it's this unit, rather than its SI or dimensionless
> equivalent, that gives the maximum digits of precision in a floating-point
> representation of salinity.
> It's a valid concern, and CF should perhaps reconsider, with a new
> discussion giving weight to the views of modelers as well as physical
> Lowry, Roy K. writes:
>> Hello Martin,
>> This topic has been debated at length in CF. To cut a long story short,
>> the term 'Practical Salinity Unit' was coined when the 1978 Practical
>> Salinity scale was devised. However, the term fell out of favour with the
>> physical oceanographic community whose current recommended practice is that
>> Practical Salinity - a ratio - should be a dimensionless number. CF
>> followed this recommendation and so PSU is not a part of CF.
>> Have a dig around in the mailing list archive if you want to find out
>> Cheers, Roy.
>> Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only working
>> 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on Wednesdays, my
>> day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent to
>> enquiries at bodc.ac.uk. Please also use this e-mail if your requirement is
>> From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of
>> martin.juckes at stfc.ac.uk <martin.juckes at stfc.ac.uk>
>> Sent: 18 July 2017 13:43
>> To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu; d.c.hassell at reading.ac.uk;
>> r.s.hatcher at reading.ac.uk
>> Subject: [CF-metadata] Is "psu" a valid cf unit?
>> Hello David, all,
>> Is "psu" a valus CF unit? It is not in Udunits, but it is added in
>> cf-python as a unit alias and also appears to be accpeted by the cf-checker.
>> I can't see any mention of it in the CF Convention document: the latter only
>> lists level, layer, and sigma_level permitted departures from Udunits,
>> CF-metadata mailing list
>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>> CF-metadata Info Page - University Corporation for
>> This is an unmoderated list for discussions about interpretation,
>> clarification, and proposals for extensions or change to the CF conventions.
>> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is
>> subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this
>> email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt
>> from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in
>> an electronic records management system.
> V. Balaji Office: +1-609-452-6516
> Head, Modeling Systems Group, GFDL Mobile: +1-917-273-9824
> Princeton University Email: v.balaji at noaa.gov
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
More information about the CF-metadata