[Liwg-core] Rain-snow repartitioning
sacks at ucar.edu
Wed Jan 11 14:39:18 MST 2017
Hi all (just including LIWG folks here),
I was just giving Bette a recap of our discussion on rain-snow repartitioning, and this raised a couple of questions for us:
(1) For Greenland, is it correct that a change to the rain-snow partitioning would lead to more rain, which is a degradation relative to observations – but that Jan and Bill L feel we can (and should) live with this degradation in order to boost the melt?
(2) Particularly if (1) is true: Since it feels like this achieves the right answer (net SMB) for the wrong reasons (too much rain): Has any thought been given to whether this makes sense in a climate change (future or paleo) world?
(3) Has anyone looked at what this change to rain-snow partitioning does over Antarctica? We want to be sure that we're not substantially degrading the Antarctica SMB from this change....
More information about the Liwg-core