[Liwg-core] simulations

Jean-Francois Lamarque lamar at ucar.edu
Wed Jan 18 08:54:35 MST 2017


Hi Jan

If you can, it'd be great if you could perform the tests yourself, but make
sure you get the latest setup
from Cécile.

Jean-François

----------

Jean-François Lamarque
National Center for Atmospheric Research
P.O. Box 3000
Boulder, CO 80305
Tel: 303-4971495
*https://staff.ucar.edu/users/lamar <https://staff.ucar.edu/users/lamar>*

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Lenaerts, J.T.M. (Jan) <j.lenaerts at uu.nl>
wrote:

> Hi J-F,
>
> Thanks. Just to avoid confusion: should we perform these tests ourselves,
> or will there be a new ‘common’ control simulation that includes our latest
> changes?
>
> All the best,
>
> Jan
>
> On 17 Jan 2017, at 19:40, Jean-Francois Lamarque <lamar at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Leo
>
> Thanks for the quick check. Yes, there is still time to look at albedo
> changes, but it would be best to
> start from 129 if you can.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jean-François
>
> ----------
>
> Jean-François Lamarque
> National Center for Atmospheric Research
> P.O. Box 3000
> Boulder, CO 80305
> Tel: 303-4971495 <(303)%20497-1495>
> *https://staff.ucar.edu/users/lamar <https://staff.ucar.edu/users/lamar>*
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Kampenhout, L. van (Leo) <
> L.vanKampenhout at uu.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jean-François,
>>
>> (1) I quickly checked the melt and SMB values for run 129, there is no
>> change from run 126. SMB sits at 531 Gt/yr.
>>
>> (2) If that's still possible, that would be great.
>>
>> Best,
>> Leo
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>>
>> Leo van Kampenhout
>> Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht University
>> BBG room 672
>> +31 30 2533271 <+31%2030%20253%203271>
>> http://www.uu.nl/staff/LvanKampenhout/0
>>
>> On 17 Jan 2017, at 18:48, Jean-Francois Lamarque <lamar at ucar.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Hi LIWG
>>
>> a couple of thoughts after the meeting
>>
>> 1) can you look at 129 to see what the SMB is in this case?  Do you
>> need to have a few more years?
>> 2) it might be worth to do the albedo tuning in 129 since, according to
>> Dave, the Arctic vegetation will not change (and so the T response we are
>> seeing now should be staying).
>>
>> Hope this helps.  Cheers,
>>
>> Jean-François
>>
>> ----------
>>
>> Jean-François Lamarque
>> National Center for Atmospheric Research
>> P.O. Box 3000
>> Boulder, CO 80305
>> Tel: 303-4971495 <(303)%20497-1495>
>> *https://staff.ucar.edu/users/lamar <https://staff.ucar.edu/users/lamar>*
>> _______________________________________________
>> Liwg-core mailing list
>> Liwg-core at cgd.ucar.edu
>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/liwg-core
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Liwg-core mailing list
> Liwg-core at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/liwg-core
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> *Jan Lenaerts  *IMAU, Utrecht University
> @lenaertsjan <https://twitter.com/lenaertsjan> || IMAU website
> <http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~lenae101/> || CU
> <http://www.colorado.edu/lab/icesheetclimate/> website
> <http://www.colorado.edu/lab/icesheetclimate/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/liwg-core/attachments/20170118/c9988765/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Liwg-core mailing list